A benefits cheat jailed for two years after being secretly filmed completing five kilometre runs while claiming she could barely walk has been freed after serving just six months behind bars. Annette Bond was originally jailed for two years after a trial heard she systematically duped the benefits agency for almost a decade, and the sentence was cut to 18 months on appeal.
But Perth Sheriff Court was told yesterday that Bond had already been released from prison after serving just a quarter of the sheriff’s original sentence imposed in May 2024.
Solicitor Linda Clark, defending, said: “She is currently on a home detention curfew after being released on 14 November. She is to remain indoors from 7.15pm to 7.15am each day and that will continue until 13 February. Now she is at liberty she will be able to do something about the funds that have to be paid back.”
Online jeweller Bond was back in court to seek an extra six months to pay back the £67,062.50 she has been ordered to hand over under Proceeds of Crime legislation. Mrs Clark said that the silversmith would be in a better position to raise funds after her release from prison and was looking at taking out a loan or a mortgage on her home.
Sheriff William Wood granted the six-month extension, but warned Bond that no further time could be granted beyond that. Bond made a claim for benefits stating that she required someone with her at all times when she was outdoors because she had poor balance and was at risk of dizzy spells and falling.
However, investigators filmed damning evidence of her completing regular five km training runs from her home without any signs of mobility issues.
Sheriff William Wood told her: “The rate of benefits awarded to you was dependent upon honest disclosure of your abilities. On the basis of your application, you were awarded the highest rate of the care component and the higher rate of the mobility component of DLA.
“These are normally for those who cannot, or are virtually unable to, walk unaided. Former work colleagues clearly indicated you did not require either the level of care or impaired mobility required for the benefits you claimed.
“You rarely used a stick; you were able to get around the workplace unaided; you could negotiate stairs; and you were able to dance at a Christmas function.
“But by far the most graphic evidence in the trial that your condition had improved was the surveillance footage obtained by DWP investigators from 2017, recording your ability to run five km, over mixed terrain, more than once a week.
“I have noted you continue to maintain your innocence,” Sheriff Wood said. “You must have known you did not meet the criteria for the benefits of which you were in receipt. Your conduct can only be characterised as a prolonged and egregious course of dishonesty, for which there is no excuse.
“You have obtained, through fraud, a significant sum of money to which you had no entitlement and you have deprived the taxpayer of funds that might have been usefully spent elsewhere. You have defrauded the state of a large sum of money over a protracted period. I am satisfied only a custodial sentence is appropriate.”
Bond spent a decade claiming “enhanced” benefit payments due to a series of conditions she claimed made it difficult for her to stand up or even get out of bed. But a fraud investigation team set up secret surveillance to capture Bond running around 5,000 metre circuits from her home up to four times a week.
The jury at Perth Sheriff Court heard how the 49-year-old spent nearly ten years conning taxpayers out of £67,062.50 by claiming her mobility was severely impaired by multiple sclerosis. However, they found her guilty after being shown video footage of Bond leaving her home in high visibility running gear to carry out sub-30 minute 5k runs around her neighbourhood.
Department of Work and Pensions fraud investigator Scott Hodge, 54, said the team eventually quit the surveillance operation early because they had gathered so much damning evidence against Bond. He told the court that the team parked in view of Bond’s home and filmed her running the same route three times in a ten-day period in 2017.
“She is walking briskly and then she turns at the junction and begins to run. That road was taking her away from Stanley and into a wooded area,” he said. “I have gone ahead of the subject and then captured footage of her running along the road back into Stanley. It would have been hills, ascents and descents, at various different parts of the journey.
“We used an internet website to ascertain the distance. The estimated distance run was 4,800 metres – just short of three miles.”
He said Bond completed the run in 27 minutes. Mr Hodge told the court that Bond had completed the runs without any support from anyone else, had not been unsteady on her feet, and did not appear to be impaired.
He said the team had been granted a warrant to carry out the surveillance operation between 30 May and 29 August 2017, but brought it to a premature conclusion after less than two weeks. He said: “It was felt that we would probably just see more of the same over the following days, so the decision was taken to end surveillance.”
Her mother, Elizabeth Bond, 68, told the jury her daughter was diagnosed with MS in 2004, but exercised regularly to fight the condition. Mrs Bond said: “I occasionally saw her when I was on the way to work. She was out running. I was very pleased to see she was fit enough to run.
“It was most mornings on my way to work. For months. She seemed to walk quite well. She was exercising to try and strengthen her legs. I think she had a running machine in her house. I think it was a cross-trainer she had as well.”
In her own evidence, Bond admitted running around four times per week, but claimed the investigators happened to catch her out during a period when she was fitter.
Bond, 50, of Shielhill Park, Stanley, Perthshire, was found guilty of fraudulently obtaining £67,062.50 in benefits from on or around 1 April 2009 until 27 November 2018.
The jury found her guilty of failing to tell the DWP about a change in her condition which meant her support needs and physical ability had improved. The claims were for Disability Living Allowance ‘enhanced care’ and ‘enhanced mobility’ payments.
Don’t miss the latest news from around Scotland and beyond. Sign up to our daily newsletter.